Wal-Mart gives major boost to domestic medical tourism movement

The retailer joins the ranks of companies sending employees to hospitals far from home in the name of less expensive and better care.

A small but growing number of U.S. corporations are offering their insured employees the option of undergoing certain procedures at highly ranked health systems across America at almost no out-of-pocket cost to them — travel included.

The companies believe sending heart and spine patients elsewhere would result in improved care for patients and lower costs for employers. Although companies are just getting started in pushing what is often called domestic medical tourism, analysts say it’s something doctors should keep an eye on. Physicians may find patients bypassing them on the way to health systems elsewhere. Others may be handling pre- and post-care for procedures performed hundreds or thousands of miles away.

“We’re going to see a lot more of this,” said Simon Hudson, PhD, director of the SC Center of Economic Excellence in Tourism and Economic Development at the University of South Carolina and an expert on medical tourism. “And if physicians cannot compete on price, then they are going to have to compete on quality and exceptional customer service if they are going to keep patients.”

These programs usually involve a large company negotiating a bundled rate from a health system for certain services. The procedures are then offered to employees who need them, with no co-pays or deductibles. Travel expenses for the patient and a caregiver are usually thrown in. Employees still have the option of receiving these services in their hometown, but co-pays and deductibles apply. For example:

  • Wal-Mart Stores announced Oct. 12 that, as of Jan. 1, 2013, 1.1 million people covered under its employee health insurance will have access to heart and spine surgeries at one of six health systems identified as “Centers of Excellence.” The health systems are Cleveland Clinic; Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pa.; Mayo Clinic sites in Rochester, Minn., Scottsdale, Ariz., and Jacksonville, Fla.; Scott & White Memorial Hospital in Temple, Texas; Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle; and Mercy Hospital Springfield in Springfield, Mo. The latter hospital is the closest to Wal-Mart’s corporate headquarters in Bentonville, Ark.
  • As of Oct. 1, Boeing Co. had a similar arrangement for heart surgery at Cleveland Clinic for the company’s 83,000 nonunion employees, dependents and retirees.
  • PepsiCo announced Dec. 8, 2011, that the 250,000 employees covered by its health insurance plan could travel to Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore for heart surgery and joint replacements with no out-of-pocket costs.
  • Lowe’s Companies started offering fully covered cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic in 2010 for its 234,000 employees and many more dependents on its insurance plan. The program expanded to chronic pain management and spinal surgery in September 2012.
  • HCR ManorCare, which has 60,000 employees, began offering fully covered cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic as of April 1.

Companies have released very little information about how many employees have traveled for care and how much money employers have saved. About the only information comes from Lowe’s, which reports that by the end of the first quarter of 2012, it had sent 50 employees and covered dependents to Cleveland Clinic for care. Although a small number, it exceeded expectations.

Health systems that have experience providing bundled payment arrangements say they are being approached by more companies looking for this kind of arrangement. The systems have said they are actively selling their services to national employers. Companies that have programs in place say they are looking for new procedures to make available and health systems to include.

“We’re looking to expand these programs to reduce our associates’ out-of-pocket medical costs and provide the highest quality of care,” said Randy Hargrove, a Wal-Mart spokesman. “And we plan to expand this program to include more procedures and providers.”

The shift to domestic medical tourism is in part because foreign medical tourism, which was talked about a few years ago as a means of controlling costs, never really took off. A report published Oct. 26, 2009, by the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions labeled the call for foreign medical tourism “tepid.” Sixty-nine percent in a survey of 3,000 patients included in the paper said they would not go outside the country for elective procedures.

“We have a perception that health care quality is much better here,” said Terry White, CEO of BridgeHealth Medical, a health care tourism company based in Denver. “Whether that is true or not is not the issue.”

Domestic medical tourism seems an easier sell. To some extent, there is comfort on the patients’ part in traveling for medical services. For instance, an issue brief published in September by the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Health Institute found that 69.9% of 47,300 inpatient stays were not at facilities nearest to where the patient lived. In 43.4% of the cases, patients took a trip to larger facilities even though the services they needed were offered at their local hospitals. Some employees of the companies work in rural areas and traveled out of necessity, because the care they required wasn’t available nearby.

The health systems are devising ways to ensure that the primary care physician in the patient’s hometown is kept in the loop. For example, physicians with Geisinger Health System will have extensive discussions with a potential patient’s physician before accepting him or her for care. The communication will continue during the hospital stay and after the procedure.

“We want to make sure the handoff before the patient gets to us and after they leave is smooth and transparent,” said Alfred Casale, MD, Geisinger’s director of cardiac and thoracic surgery. “We will continue the interaction for as long as it takes, and we want to make sure the right patients are coming here.”

source: http://www.ama-assn.org / amednews.com / American Medical News / Home> Business / by Victoria Stagg Elliott, amednews staff / October 29th, 2012

Gallery

Medical tourism conference, India

Experts from nine countries will attend an international conference here on November 2 and 3 to promote medical tourism in India. The two-day Indian Medical Tourism Conference and Alliance 2012 (IMTCA 2012) is being organised by i-Transition Worldwide (I) Pvt. … Continue reading →

Reproductive tourism: Paying women in poor countries to bear our babies is rife with ethical problems

Ottawa:

Reproductive tourism, the phenomenon of people crossing international borders to purchase assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) is now a multi-billion dollar industry. Its most ethically problematic manifestation is when citizens of wealthy countries (like Canada and the USA) travel to poorer countries (most commonly India) to purchase the services of asurrogate mother.

By some accounts, the Indian ART industry is worth $500 million to $2.3 billion.

In their upcoming paper, “Ethical concerns for maternal surrogacy and reproductive tourism” in theJournal of Medical Ethics, Professor Raywat Deonandan of the Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences at the University of Ottawa, along with students Samantha Green and Amanda van Beinum, enumerate the specific ethical challenges posed by this emerging new industry.

Along with six other concerning issues, the authors identified the tension between business ethics and medical ethics as being at the heart of the industry’s ethical problem, along with an insufficiently broad definition of “informed consent.” When desperately poor, illiterate and vulnerable village women are entering into complicated contracts to sell their reproductive health to wealthy foreigners, often some of the softer social risks are not communicated to them, such as their risk of estrangement from their communities, or the risk of domestic unease with their spouses and existing children.

Part of the problem is that when commerce collides with medicine, there isn’t an agreed upon ethical framework for establishing rights and responsibilities. In a business negotiation, each actor has to worry about his own best interests only. But in a medical conversation, the clinic is morally responsible for everyone’s interests, including both the surrogate’s and the client’s. This new blend of business and health care has yet to navigate a path between these two poles.

The extent to which Indian ART clinics overtly cater to the needs of non-Indians has always been difficult to determine, as is any sort of measurement of how many foreigners travel to India specifically to seek out ART services, especially maternal surrogacy services. In another recent paper, “Measuring reproductive tourism through an analysis of Indian ART clinic websites” inInternational Journal of General Medicine, Professor Deonandan and students Mirhad Loncar, Prinon Rahman and Sabrina Omar analyzed the official websites of 159 Indian ART clinics to determine how many were actively seeking a foreign clientele.

What they discovered was that 86% of the clinics made some mention of reproductive tourism services, with 47% overtly offering surrogates to clients. Their results also hint at a growing domestic market for Indian ART services, truly making this industry a deep, global phenomenon.

The consideration of the global ART industry subtends all of the hot-button topics of our day: women’s rights, globalization, the exploitation of the poor, the challenges of creating a family in the modern world, the commoditization of the human body, science advancing faster than society, and the question of how much regulation is needed in the business world. As Canada is one of the few countries in the world with a federal law restricting certain ART practices, many infertile Canadians travel to India to seek out reproductive services. An exploration of the ethics of this practice is therefore relevant to us all.

source: http://www.HealthCanal.com / Home> Pregnancy and Childbirth / October 23rd, 2012

Polish Information and Foreign Investment Agency : Medical Sector in Miami

Medical Sector in Miami

24.10.2012 – 26.10.2012
Miami

Between October 24 – 26 in Miami will be held one of the biggest events in the world in the industry of medical tourism – World Medical Tourism & Global Healthcare Congress.
This is the first of 22 scheduled promotional events where Polish entrepreneurs can take part in the project “Programme for the Promotion of medical tourism industry”, financed by the action POIG 6.5.1. Polish companies participating in the congress may apply for reimbursement of expenses incurred for promotion up to 75 percent. Other activities will be held in Poland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Germany, Russia and Great Britain. Time-frames the years 2012-2015.

“World Medical Tourism & Global Healthcare Congress” in Miami, visited by approximately 1,500 people from over 90 countries. During the event over 10,000 meetings is held. Congress participants are health care and medical tourism providers, employers, managers of large firms, representatives of insurance companies and the wellness industry, government organizations and suppliers of advanced medical technologies.

Polish companies participating in the project can count on support of the Organiser in the reservation, preparation of exhibition stands, promotional materials, travel logistics and organization of meetings with potential clients and partners.

PAIiIZ invites Polish companies from the medical industry to participate in this event. For more information please contact: Project Manager, Dr Ada Kostrz-Kostecka, EuCP, akostrz-kostecka@eucp.pl, Iwona Lipska, PAIiIZ SA,iwona.lipska@paiz.gov.pl, Magdalena Rutkowska, CEO of AMEDS Centre, m.rutkowska@ameds.com, Marta Mierzwi

source: http://www.4-traders.com / Home Page> News / October 22nd, 2012

Gallery

Int’l conference due on promoting medical tourism

DAEJEON, South Korea, Oct. 21 (Yonhap) An international conference will be held here Wednesday to promote South Korea’s quality medical services combined with tourism, the provincial government said Sunday. The conference at Daejeon Convention Center in Daejeon, South Chungcheong Province, … Continue reading →